Showing posts with label second amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label second amendment. Show all posts
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Does Justice Elena Kagan have the right to bear arms?
Apparently so. Rumor has it she was spotted shooting skeet with Justice Antonin Scalia. This is a hopeful sign, since Kagan is thought to hold negative opinions on the second amendment. My apologies for not including a picture of Kagan with this story.
Labels:
antonin scalia,
elena kagan,
second amendment,
skeet shooting
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
I Have a Sick Feeling About The Second Amendment
Only 5 of 9 supreme court justices supported American's right to keep and bear arms. And Obama is about to appoint ANOTHER justice after only 18 months in office? Is anybody else getting a bad feeling about this?
Interesting. I never knew the Chicago case was challenged by a black man wanting to protect himself from drug gangs and dealers in his neighborhood. The news forgot to report that side of the story.
And I challenge Mayor Daley's facts. In Switzerland, every home has a firearm. There was ONE murder last year. Disarming the good guys is not helpful.
Interesting. I never knew the Chicago case was challenged by a black man wanting to protect himself from drug gangs and dealers in his neighborhood. The news forgot to report that side of the story.
And I challenge Mayor Daley's facts. In Switzerland, every home has a firearm. There was ONE murder last year. Disarming the good guys is not helpful.
Saturday, February 20, 2010
O'Reilly Defends His Statements On Gun Confiscation In State Of Emergency
Here we go again.
Commenter greywolfe at therightscoop said:
"It boils down to this: There is no provision in the constitution that allows the government to disarm a law abiding citizen. The tenth amendment states that any right not granted to the federal government belongs to the states or THE PEOPLE. His assertion that any action by the government is legal unless a court says otherwise is spurious at best. That leads to tyranny of the courts and that is not the province of the courts. I'm sending this comment to O'reilly. Let's see if he still wants to defend those comments."
Commenter greywolfe at therightscoop said:
"It boils down to this: There is no provision in the constitution that allows the government to disarm a law abiding citizen. The tenth amendment states that any right not granted to the federal government belongs to the states or THE PEOPLE. His assertion that any action by the government is legal unless a court says otherwise is spurious at best. That leads to tyranny of the courts and that is not the province of the courts. I'm sending this comment to O'reilly. Let's see if he still wants to defend those comments."
Friday, February 19, 2010
O'Reilly Says Second Amendment Is Optional
He thinks that bad weather can suspend the Constitution. I disagree. In fact, I'm a little tongue-tied after viewing this video. I may have to remove O'Reilly from my DVR. Since when did defending the Constitution become an "extreme position." :-(
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
I joined the NRA

Can you believe it? I, myself, a 40-something-year-old American mother-of-6, joined the National Rifle Association. Not only did I join, but I paid in advance for an extra year of membership. Why? Because I feel that our rights as citizens of this country are under attack. And the Second Amendment to the Constitution is one of those VERY important rights that needs to be defended. I sent in my money.
Those of you who know me from way back are aware that I have studied Karate, Jujitsu and Judo, along with brief work with ancient types of Japanese weapons. While studying at those dojos, I was invited to trips to the shooting range, and took courses there, most memorably a combat pistol shooting course. It was educational and informative.
I believe strongly in gun safety. I also believe in Americans' right to defend themselves against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And, as a woman who has received death threats in the past from an Ex (a firearms expert), I have personally felt the comfort of having a firearm available for use in my home.
On another occasion, I remember sitting up all night long on the night of the 1992 Los Angeles riots, with a borrowed pistol in my lap. I waited alone in my apartment with my sleeping preschoolers in the other room, not knowing if rioting would come to my door. As it was, the riots did come close to my home. There was looting in the Burbank Costco, a store I frequented regularly. Above is a photo borrowed from a friend. This message was on the outside of someone's house in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina.
For many years I believed the rhetoric of the gun-control proponents who said that banning assault weapons would make us safer. The reality is, that criminals will get the guns they want, including fully automatic weapons. Disarming law-abiding citizens only encourages the lawless. Many guns called "assault" weapons are simply semi-automatic rifles, which squeeze off one shot at a time.
The NRA has this to say about banning assault weapons: "In America, the burden of proof is not upon those who wish to exercise rights, it is upon those who wish to restrict rights, and there is no evidence that an “assault weapon” ban reduces crime. An irrational bias against guns, mixed with an assumed sense of intellectual, social or cultural superiority to gun owners, may seem to gun control supporters like sufficient grounds to ban firearms, but such notions are insufficient in a democracy."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)