Showing posts with label Barack Hussein Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barack Hussein Obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Archie Bunker on Obama and liberal progressives....

I love the part where Bunker has the solution to hijackings. He could have prevented 9/11 but people just laughed.

Hat tip Theospark, Texas Rainmaker and Dovethere.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Will Hillary rise as Obama admin goes down?

Is Eric Holder going to jail for Project Gunrunner obstruction of justice?

Are Washington Dems and Repubs aligning against Obama and his minions?

Will Hillary primary Obama?

Is the Wiener scandal distracting us from the bad economy and Obama's failed policies, including the active Obamacare trial in which 3 bipartisan judges are sounding quite skeptical of Obamacare?

Will the U.S. of A. remain a constitutional republic?

Inquiring minds want to know....

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Dick Morris says no way Obama will win 2012 at present rate

It is a hopeful summary, although Morris has been wrong before. Obama is turning hard left now, and after the shellacking of 2010 this does not seem wise.  Even the White House janitor could plan it better than that.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

What A Relief

I have been enjoying the respite from the Obama Daily Outrages that had been jammed down our throats for the first 18 months of Obama's presidency. We now possess a legislature that would rather vacate than legislate. Would that they could have vacated their offices just before destroying the greatest health care system in the world. Obama has attempted a fundamental transformation of the United States, and with luck, we shall have it. Only not in the way Obama imagines. My hope is that the conservative resurgence will do Reagan one better. Maybe we can make progress back to the original intent of the constitution. Wouldn't it be great if we could end all declared states of emergency so that the president would stop legislating via executive orders? I hope we can defund and defang Obamacare before more hospitals go under.

I hope the dems don't damage their party any further by lame duck shenanigans. Jamming more hateful legislation down our throats will not win them elections. Not now, and not anytime soon. Maybe not until a new generation of youngsters is re-educated.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Even Obama's Supporters Realize There is Nothing to Support Anymore

Best comment I have read all week:
“Let me put this bluntly: virtually no one in America gives a damn what Barack Obama says about anything at this point. What could be more predictable, and less interesting, than Obama’s opinion on any given subject? Who wants to contemplate the economic wisdom of a guy who looted the Treasury for a trillion dollars, with less benefit than we could have achieved by stuffing hundred dollar bills into random cereal boxes? Who’s excited to hear about the next plan to convert taxpayer dollars into Democrat campaign funds? Who’s hungry for another hour of tedious excuses about permanently broken markets and the titanic dead hand of George W. Bush? Who wants a lecture on ethical business practices from the titular head of the party that gave us Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters? What use is another hollow foreign-policy speech from a man who sees no global adversary to rival the menace of Arizona? Even Obama’s supporters don’t hear anything he says any more. There’s nothing left to hear.”

Just goes to show. Even Obama's supporters are exhausted trying to defend him. Via RCP and Gateway Pundit.

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Help Make A List Of Obama's Impeachable Offenses

Does everybody know about Fuzzy Slippers? She is one of the finest small blog writers on the internet, as far as I'm concerned. And she inspired me again this morning. I, like her, could not stomach watching Obama's speech last night. She caught it later on video, and I did not. She gave an excellent play-by-play. And one part touches on something that reminds me of a pet peeve of mine.

Impeachable offenses. That's right, I said it. Let's make a nice list, so the new congress elected in November will have an easier time getting started.

Seizure of private industry. Can somebody tell me where in the U.S. Constitution the government is authorized to seize private industry? The auto companies were not only taken lawlessly, but the company stocks were forcibly taken from preferred stockholders and given to Obama's cronies in the unions.  Is this America? How can this stand. Obama and his henchmen should be in jail for theft.

Add to that the takeover of the banks. How is it OK for Obama to force a bailout on healthy banks, then use this as an excuse to dictate business practices? Where in the Constitution is this activity authorized?

Do we even have a Constitution anymore? Or is it just a museum piece? Our forefathers and Oathkeepers fought and died for it. For our freedom.  Freedom from tyrannical government.

And now some Americans talk of taking over British Petroleum. Can anyone explain to me how an American president would go about taking over a British company? How is this even feasible? Or would it involve seizing American assets? How is this legal? Or even wise given the current situation? We need BP to help stop the gusher, clean up the mess and compensate damaged Americans. How would a government takeover help? It would put Americans on the hook for all of that. This can only make sense to a dedicated Marxist.

The Sestak affair may prove to be Obama's undoing. But impeaching Obama based on bribery will be like putting Al Capone in jail for tax evasion. Effective, but misses his more gross violations.

Either way, concrete regulations need to be put in place where any candidate for president needs to submit proof that he is a natural born citizen. Even incumbent candidates. Ha. That will fix Obama's little red wagon....

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Latest Obama Bisexual Allegations

Two articles came out this week explaining what the scuttlebutt is in the Chicago gay district. This story at MindBodyPolitic explains how Obama is linked with a number of men, some of whom are employed at the White House. The article is from Wayne Madsen Report, a subscription service, put out on the blogosphere by the Jag Hunter. The blackmail vulnerability of Obama and Rahm Emmanuel is a vulnerability for our country.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

I've Had It With The Condescender-In-Chief

I mean it. Who does he think he is to tell us we cannot handle our tech devices and that we cannot tell what ranks high on the "truth-meter" or not. And whose truth meter are we talking about. HIS? Because if it were up to him, Fox News would disappear off the cable networks. Rush, Hannity and Levin would disappear off of the air waves. Conservative bloggers would disappear off of the internet. Huffington Post would be required morning reading.

Obama said: "Meanwhile, you're coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't rank all that high on the truth meter. With iPods and iPads; Xboxes and PlayStations; information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment. All of this is not only putting new pressures on you; it is putting new pressures on our country and on our democracy."

This guy is SO transparent. He hates us and he gets his digs in when he can. He was speaking in front of a group of new graduates and wanted to warn them about us purveyors of information. Be careful, Little Red Riding Hood, don't talk to strangers. They might not have your best interest at heart. They might be a...a....heaven forbid, a distraction!

The techies have this issue all wrong. Obama could care less who uses what tech device. I Pad, I Pod, x-boxes. He doesn't want them having access to "unfiltered" opinions on the internet. Some of which don't meet HIS idea of truth. That was his real message and I think Fidel Castro would be proud. Not to mention Chavez.

Pic from NYDailyNews.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Obama Repeatedly Heckled at Fundraiser


"Nothing too exciting but since this is as irritable as we’re likely to see President Spock get, it qualifies as fun enough for a late-night palate cleanser. Things start hopping around two minutes in and then again at five minutes in." Click HERE to see the video.

Actually, I had been curious about this fundraiser since I live in the So. Cal. area. I have to say it gives me a chuckle to see him heckled by his base. So sorry to see things not going smoothly (not).
Hat Tip Hot Air.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Free Kittens From A Little Girl


A pretty little girl named Suzy was standing on the sidewalk in front of her home. Next to her was a basket containing a number tiny creatures; in her hand was a sign announcing FREE KITTENS.

Suddenly a line of big black cars pulled up beside her. Out of the lead car stepped a tall, grinning man.

"Hi there, little girl, I'm President Obama. What do you have in the basket?" he asked.

"Kittens," little Suzy said.

"How old are they?" asked Obama.

Suzy replied, "They're so young, their eyes aren't even open yet."

"And what kind of kittens are they?"

"Democrats," answered Suzy with a smile.

Obama was delighted. As soon as he returned to his car, he called his PR chief and told him about the little girl and the kittens.

Recognizing the perfect photo op, the two men agreed that the president should return the next day, and, in front of the assembled media, have the girl talk about her discerning kittens.

So the next day, Suzy was again standing on the sidewalk with her basket of "FREE KITTENS" when another motorcade pulled up, this time followed by vans from ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN.

Cameras and audio equipment were quickly set up, then Obama got out of his limo and walked over to little Suzy.

"Hello, again," he said, "I'd love it if you would tell all my friends out there what kind of kittens you're giving away."

"Yes sir," Suzy said. "They're Republicans."

Taken by surprise, the president stammered, "But... But... Yesterday, you told me they were DEMOCRATS."

Little Suzy smiled and said, "I know. But today, they have their eyes open."

Hat Tip Davra.

Cheer Up: Have Some of Obama's Unicorns and Rainbows


April Fools! Cool short ad from the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Hat Tip RRR & Say Anything.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Eeew! Obama's Twitterer Is From MoveOn Dot Org


Not that there's anything wrong with that. It is only that this woman (on left) represented Obama to ten million people, and she was previously a fellow of NOI, the New Organizing Institute, a subgroup of MoveOn dot Org, a Soros-funded organization.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Obama Will Avoid Olympics and Madrid Summit

The question is why. Can his Obamisma be falling flat? Where is the man who promised Americans renewed good relations with the world's leaders. Is Obama so stung by past criticism and rejection that he cannot function as our representative on the world stage? This is what happens when you elect a child to do a grown-up's job. Is this his new foreign policy? Hunker in the Bunker?
In his latest flippant snub against American allies -including some of his own most fervent cheerleaders- Barack Obama has now managed to offend the entire EU by flaking on a planned Madrid summit... one who's whole purpose was to symbolize the close co-operation between the US and Europe! European leaders were informed of this by the Obama administration only after they already saw it on the web, nice.

Hat Tip RRR.
Something just doesn’t add up when the current First Family talks about saving money. They’d save a fortune, at least $10 million a year, by not throwing lavish “night at Versailles” cocktail parties every Wednesday at the White House to amuse themselves. They cost taxpayers a fortune racing off to Copenhagen to embarrass themselves before the International Olympic Committee last fall, when they put on an ostentatious display that failed to place Chicago any higher than FOURTH (out of four bids) for the selection of the 2016 host city.
Do you think THAT is what this is really about?
Because they felt snubbed by the IOC in 2009, they’re not going to attend the Vancouver Olympics in 2010?

Hat Tip Hillbuzz.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Obama Signs Executive Order Establishing Council of Governors


ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS By the authority vested in me as President by theConstitution and the laws of the United States of America,including section 1822 of the National Defense AuthorizationAct of 2008 (Public Law 110-181), and in order to strengthenfurther the partnership between the Federal Government and Stategovernments to protect our Nation and its people and property,it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Council of Governors.
(a) There is established a Council of Governors (Council).The Council shall consist of 10 State Governors appointed bythe President (Members), of whom no more than five shall be ofthe same political party. The term of service for each Member appointed to serve on the Council shall be 2 years, but a Membermay be reappointed for additional terms.

(b) The President shall designate two Members, whoshall not be members of the same political party, to serve asCo-Chairs of the Council.

Sec. 2. Functions. The Council shall meet at the call of the Secretary of Defense or the Co-Chairs of the Council toexchange views, information, or advice with the Secretary ofDefense; the Secretary of Homeland Security; the Assistant tothe President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism; theAssistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs andPublic Engagement; the Assistant Secretary of Defense forHomeland Defense and Americas' Security Affairs; the Commander,United States Northern Command; the Chief, National GuardBureau; the Commandant of the Coast Guard; and other appropriateofficials of the Department of Homeland Security and theDepartment of Defense, and appropriate officials of otherexecutive departments or agencies as may be designated by theSecretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security.Such views, information, or advice shall concern:

(a) matters involving the National Guard of the variousStates;

(b) homeland defense;

(c) civil support;

(d) synchronization and integration of State and Federalmilitary activities in the United States; and

(e) other matters of mutual interest pertaining toNational Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.

Sec. 3. Administration.

(a) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an ExecutiveDirector to coordinate the work of the Council.

(b) Members shall serve without compensation for theirwork on the Council. However, Members shall be allowed travelexpenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, asauthorized by law.

(c) Upon the joint request of the Co-Chairs ofthe Council, the Secretary of Defense shall, to theextent permitted by law and subject to the availability ofappropriations, provide the Council with administrative support,assignment or detail of personnel, and information as may benecessary for the performance of the Council's functions.

(d) The Council may establish subcommittees of theCouncil. These subcommittees shall consist exclusively ofMembers of the Council and any designated employees of a Memberwith authority to act on the Member's behalf, as appropriate toaid the Council in carrying out its functions under this order.

(e) The Council may establish a charter that is consistentwith the terms of this order to refine further its purpose,scope, and objectives and to allocate duties, as appropriate,among members.

Sec. 4. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) the term "State" has the meaning provided inparagraph (15) of section 2 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002(6 U.S.C. 101(15)); and

(b) the term "Governor" has the meaning provided inparagraph (5) of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford DisasterRelief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(5)).

Sec. 5. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair orotherwise affect:

(1) the authority granted by law to adepartment, agency, or the head thereof; or

(2) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistentwith applicable law and subject to the availability ofappropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, createany right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable atlaw or in equity by any party against the United States, itsdepartments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, oragents, or any other person.


BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,January 11, 2010.

Can anybody explain this to me? There is a large thread on Free Republic about this. Some commenters think that Obama may be anticipating a Constitutional Crisis. The crisis I see looming on the horizon comes next week when/if the Ruling Elite may decide to delay seating Scott Brown if he becomes elected Senator of Massachusetts. Is this constitutional?

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Interpol Answers to No One

Can someone explain to me what this executive order about Diplomatic Immunity for Interpol is supposed to accomplish?

On Dec. 16, days before he left on vacation, President Obama amended, by executive order, a Reagan EO. Larry O'Connor at BigGovernment.com (Breitbart) provides the most succinct description:

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued an Executive Order which gave permission to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) to operate within the boundaries of the United States. Reagan’s EO put INTERPOL under the same basic guidelines as the CIA, FBI, ATF and other Federal law enforcement agencies.

Two weeks ago, without any announcement, debate, discussion or inquiry from journalists charged with “speaking truth to power” President Obama issued an amendment to this EO. The amendment removed part of Reagan’s order that kept INTERPOL from having full diplomatic immunity while operating within the United States. In other words: Under Reagan and right up until two weeks ago, INTERPOL was authorized to operate within the USA but they did not have full diplomatic immunity and had to adhere to certain laws set forth for investigative agencies. Laws that prohibit authorities from violating our constitutionally protected rights.

Does this mean that somebody from Interpol can bust down any door in America, slaughter whomever they please, then hop on a plane for home? Is that what it means? Because I don't understand how this helps America. I don't understand how a pResident, who is supposed to represent Americans' best interests, can sign away our rights like this. What is the up-side?
Hat Tip
Examiner.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Obama's Flaccid, Meaningless Words--Krauthammer


Short vid during which Charles Krauthammer hammers Obama for coming up short yet again regarding the Iranian protests. Go Get 'Em, Charlie! Hat Tip cprater.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Obama's Fundamental Transformation of America

When Obama wrote a book and said he was mentored as a youth by Frank,
(Frank Marshall Davis) an avowed Communist, people said it didn't
matter.

When it was discovered that his grandparents, were strong socialists,
sent Obama's mother to a socialist school, introduced Frank Marshall
Davis to young Obama, people said it didn't matter.

When people found out that he was enrolled as a Muslim child in school
and his father and step father were both Muslims, people said it
didn't matter.

When he wrote in another book he authored "I will stand with them
(Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
people said it didn't matter.

When he admittedly, in his book, said he chose Marxist friends and
professors in college, people said it didn't matter.

When he traveled to Pakistan, after college on an unknown national
passport, people said it didn't matter.

When he sought the endorsement of the Marxist party in 1996 as he ran
for the Illinois Senate, people said it doesn't matter.

When he sat in a Chicago Church for twenty years and listened to a
preacher spew hatred for America and preach black liberation theology,
people said it didn't matter.

When an independent Washington organization, that tracks senate voting
records, gave him the distinctive title as the "most liberal senator",
people said it didn't matter.

When the Palestinians in Gaza, set up a fund raising telethon to raise
money for his election campaign, people said it didn't matter.

When his voting record supported gun control, people said it didn't
matter.

When he refused to disclose who donated money to his election
campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn't matter.

When he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan and
Mummar Kadaffi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

When it was pointed out that he was a total, newcomer and had
absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing,
people said it didn't matter.

When he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and
Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn't
matter.

When his voting record in the Illinois senate and in the U.S. Senate
came into question, people said it didn't matter.

When he refused to wear a flag, lapel pin and did so only after a
public outcry, people said it didn't matter.

When people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools
were taught to sing his praises, people said it didn't matter.

When he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of
the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn't
matter.

When he surrounded himself in the White house with advisors who were
pro gun control, pro abortion, pro homosexual marriage and wanting to
curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition people said it
didn't matter.

When he aired his views on abortion, homosexuality and a host of other
issues, people said it didn't matter.

When he said he favors sex education in Kindergarten, including
homosexual indoctrination, people said it didn't matter.

When his background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be
found about him, people said it didn't matter.

When the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused
to produce a birth certificate, people said it didn't matter.

When he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco, a man of
questionable character, who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a
sweet deal on the purchase of his home, people said it didn't matter.

When it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist,
spent a ton of money to get him elected, people said it didn't matter.

When he started appointing czars that were radicals, revolutionaries,
and even avowed Marxist/Communist, people said it didn't matter.

When he stood before the nation and told us that his intentions were
to "fundamentally transform this nation" into something else, people
said it didn't matter.

When it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and
served as an attorney for ACORN, people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed cabinet members and several advisors, who were tax
cheats and socialist, people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed a science czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced
abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers,
people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Cass Sunstein as regulatory czar and he believes in
"Explicit Consent", harvesting human organs with out family consent,
and to allow animals to be represented in court, while banning all
hunting, people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual, and organizer of a
group called gay, lesbian, straight, Education network, as safe school
czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to
teenagers, people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Mark Lloyd as diversity czar and he believed in
curtailing free speech, taking from one and giving to another to
spread the wealth and admires Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.

When Valerie Jarrett was selected as Obama's senior White House
advisor and she is an avowed Socialist, people said it didn't matter.

When Anita Dunn, White House Communications director said Mao Tse Tung
was her favorite philosopher and the person she turned to most for
inspiration, people said it didn't matter.

When he appointed Carol Browner as global warming czar and she is a
well known socialist working on Cap and trade as the nation's largest
tax, people said it doesn't matter.

When he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as green
energy czar, who since had to resign when this was made known, people
said it didn't matter.

When Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for health and human services secretary
could not be confirmed, because he was a tax cheat, people said it
didn't matter.

When as president of the United States, he bowed to the King of Saudi
Arabia,
people said it didn't matter.
When he traveled around the world criticizing America and never once
talking of her greatness, people said it didn't matter.
When his actions concerning the middle-east seemed to support the
Palestinians over Israel, our long time friend, people said it doesn't
matter.

When he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of
Palestinians from Gaza to the United States, people said it doesn't
matter.

When he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense
system against the Russians, people said it doesn't matter.

When he played politics in Afghanistan by not sending troops the Field
Commanders said we had to have to win, people said it didn't matter.
When he started spending us into a debt that was so big we could not
pay it off,
people said it didn't matter.

When he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used
it to pay off organizations, unions and individuals that got him
elected,
people said it didn't matter.

When he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc.
people said it didn't matter.
When he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the
government, people said it didn't matter.

When he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it
under government control, people said it didn't matter.

When he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy
in the United States through Cap and Trade, people said it didn't
matter.

When he finally completed his transformation of America into a
Socialist State ,
People finally woke up... but it was too late.

Any one of these things, in and of themselves does not really matter.
But, when you add them up one by one you get a phenomenal score that
points to the fact that our Obama is determined to make America over
into a Marxist/Socialist society. All of the items in the preceding
paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very
easily. Before you disavow this, do an internet search. The last
paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone. You and I will write that
paragraph. Will it read as above or will it be a happier ending for
most of America? Personally, I like happy endings.

If you are an Obama Supporter, please do not be angry with me because
I think your president is a socialist. There are too many facts
supporting this. If you seek the truth you will be richer for it.
Don't just belittle the opposition. Search for the truth. I did.
Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Constitutionalist, Libertarians
and what have you; we all need to pull together. We all must pull
together or watch the demise of a society that we all love and
cherish. If you are a religious person, pray for our nation.

Never before in the history of America have we been confronted with
problems so huge that the very existence of our country is in
jeopardy. Don't rely on most television news and what you read in the
newspapers for the truth. Search the internet. Yes, there is a lot of
bad information, lies and distortions there too but you are smart
enough to spot the fallacies. Newspapers are a dying breed. They are
currently seeking a bailout from the government. Do you really think
they are about to print the truth? Obama praises all the television
news networks except Fox who he has waged war against. There must be a
reason. He does not call them down on any specifics, just a general
battle against them. If they lie, he should call them out on it but he
doesn't. Please, find the truth, it will set you free.

Our biggest enemy is not China, Russia, Iran; no, our biggest enemy is
a contingent of politicians in Washington DC.